12/10/2007
Everyone’s heard about the NSA Wiretaps. Some people get
enraged, some people think it’s a good thing, others don’t want to know any more
and still more have decided not to care.
We’ve all heard about the wiretaps. But have you noticed
how people react when someone tells people what’s happened to their lives and how it
feels to know you no longer have any secrets from anyone about everything from your
religious and political views to your sex life.
Victims say it is nerve-wracking and disorienting.
Psychiatrists say that such monitoring will generate paranoid schizophrenic responses
– synthesized psychotic reactions generated by PsyOps (psychological operations)
designed to do just that – symptoms that would disappear if the surveillance and
harassment was ended.
Maybe it’s time we took a closer look and understand the
effect that programs like the NSA wiretaps have on people’s lives. When you realize
how it destroys them personally, financially and spiritually, the most healthy response
would be a to say a prayer that it never happens to you. But, if it does, pray that
someone or some organization exists who understand the problem and can give you the
assistance that’s available.
It’s Real. It’s Happening. It’s Donald
Rumsfeld’s plan in action.
In 2003, Donald Rumsfeld released the plan called the
Information Operation Road Map1 which spells out various programs, including
those to attack American Citizens under the guise of Congressionally Authorized Human
Experimentation to train PsyOps agents in psychological operations as well as influence
public activities.
This is an excerpt from that report that describes what is
happening to Americans now.
"The customary position was that
"public affairs informs, while public diplomacy and PSYOP influence." PSYOP also has been
perceived as the most aggressive of the three information activities, using diverse means, including psychological
manipulation and personal threats."
Because the United States employs outsourcing of practically
everything, the technology as well psychological operations are often outsourced to
private contractors who do the work and derive other greater benefits for their parent
corporations. This also provides the government a cushion of plausible deniability should
the unconstitutional attacks on American Citizens be detected, reported and proven.
Or, the corporations developed and own the technology, as in
the case of the ACLU’s2 concern about 2 companies offering to sell actual
“mind reading” technology to security agencies.
The question almost every victim asks is, “Who gave these
people the right to decide that my life was worthless enough to destroy?” AND “Who would do those kinds of things to
people.”
The answer is sociopaths and psychopaths. There is no other
answer.
The most typical conclusion one comes to is the kind of
response you get from politicians and pundants these days: “Because we can.”
Because there is no oversight, and because corporations have
the technology and methods without the moral responsibility to control the abuse of it, or
choose to inflict abuse with it on adversaries, the victims generally come in these
categories:
- Victims who were actually randomly
chosen and legitimately picked for the program for unconstitutional human experimentations
as allowed by Congress.
- Victims who were witnesses to
racketeering or federal intelligence, military and security agency abuse, crimes and
cover-up.
- Victims who exercised their free
speech rights against the main stream media
- Victims who exercised their free
speech rights against the Bush Administration
- Victims who were unknowingly in or
became drawn into the CoInTelPro and MkUltra programs which were renamed when they were
exposed by Sen. Frank Church in 1975 and continued unabated, accelerating to the use of
unimaginable but documentable technologies that literally inflict torture on
“naughty” Americans.
This is the result of the “Era of the Brain”, your
tax dollars at work as declared by President George H.W. Bush (former CIA director,
remember?), and who also announced the New World Order’s3 emergence in
America in 1988? Of course, Tom Brokaw
announced the installation of the New World Order on October 11, 2001.
This is one of those stories that
you may not choose to believe now, but you will be forced to accept later when it happens
to you.
And if you choose to not want to know or believe that the U.S.
Government would do this to people, please read this statement by Sen. Frank Church about
the dangers of such abuse of power and authority. His words accurately describe the life
and hardships endured by victims of government attacks carried out by people who believe
the ends justify the means, just as the Bush Administration advocates torture.
The Final report of the
Church Committee (Blue Ribbon Cover-Up) concluded:
Too many people have been spied upon by too many Government
agencies and too much information has been collected.
The Government has often undertaken the secret surveillance of
citizens on the basis of their political beliefs, even when those beliefs posed no threat
of violence or illegal acts on behalf of a hostile foreign power.
The Government, operating primarily through secret informants,
but also using other intrusive techniques such as wiretaps, microphone "bugs"
surreptitious mail opening, and break-ins, has swept in vast amounts of information about
the personal lives, views, and associations of American citizens.
Investigations of groups deemed potentially dangerous -- and even
of groups suspected of associating with potentially dangerous organizations -- have continued for decades, despite the fact that those
groups did not engage in unlawful activity.
Groups and individuals have been harassed and disrupted because
of their political views and their lifestyles. Investigations
have been based upon vague standards whose breadth made excessive collection inevitable.
Unsavory and vicious tactics have been employed -- including
anonymous attempts to break up marriages, disrupt meetings, ostracize persons from their
professions, and provoke target groups into rivalries that might result in deaths.
Intelligence agencies have served the political and personal
objectives of presidents and other high officials. While the
agencies often committed excesses in response to pressure from high officials in the
Executive branch and Congress, they also occasionally initiated improper activities and
then concealed them from officials whom they had a duty to inform. Governmental officials
-- including those whose principal duty is to enforce the law --have violated or ignored
the law over long periods of time and have advocated and defended their right to break the
law.
Footnotes
1 – Donald
Rumsfeld’s Information Operation Road Map http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB177/info_ops_roadmap.pdf
2 - ACLU Liberty
& Technology Project
ACLU Objects to "Mind Reading Technology"
www.rawstory.com/news/2006/ACLU_objects_as_two_companies_offer_0628.html
3 - Pres.
George HW Bush’s 1992 State of the union address announcing the New World Order http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0900156.html
