I most certainly do not condone the latest actions of Russia against the nation of
Georgia. Or so the story goes when America puts a nation up to military action for its own
political goals. As we constantly do with Israel.
However, it's important to look beyond the actual events of the day, and remain focused
on the geo-political strategies in play.
An objective summary of the situation begins with the stated intentions of the United
States Government and the Council on Foreign Relations, represented by candidates John
McCain and Barack Obama. Both are members.
Both support the idea of a "war on terrorism" (note that the Rand Institute
recently expressed its opinions supporting mine from 5 years ago that the War on Terror
phrasing was counterproductive and a fallacy) and the continued use of military power in
the Middle East regions, supposedly to fight terror, but documented to be the battle to
control the oil supply of the world.
This includes the invasion of Afghanistan for the purpose of controlling the Caspian
Sea Oil Pipeline, the vast reserves of oil in Iraq, and thus, the profits for supplying
China with oil and natural gas, an economy that is overtaking the United States thanks to
the efforts of American politicians and financiers since the days of Nixon.
Thus, the statements of Obama and McCain are laughable, considering it either shows
their willingness to deceive us about world events, or they are naive and uninformed to
the point of being dangerous to us all. Actually, either way, they are.
In addition, the idea that the cold war had ever ended was a complete fabrication,
proven by Russia's ability to supply conventional and advanced weaponry to allies at a
rate of 6 times the level of delivery of the United States since before 2000. This is all
well documented on this site.
It's also important to note that Obama - the presumed "president to
be", has an advisor named Zbigniew Brzezinski, who is well known for his strategies
that require perpetual war in the Middle East Oil regions in order to enforce
control of the oil supply, as well as to be able to militarily suppress the Arab
and oil producing nations from taking effective action to ensure its natural resources are
not stolen by American oil profiteers (who have no problem using the lives of
American soldiers to fatten their bank accounts).
Obama, McCain, Brzezinski, Rockefeller, Council on Foreign Relations... General
Electric, Enron, Exxon... Halliburton, Bechtel, Unocal. Almost always the same players,
the same cover stories and reasons. None of which are ever truthfully disclosed to the
American Public (which is why these actions are, in fact, treason).
Now... that said. Russia is quite aware of the plans of the United States to develop a
strike force to hit any location on the planet with devastating military force and
Psychotronic weapons within 45 minutes. From space.
The aircraft that will be used to do this is the F22... interestingly enough originally
developed in the 50's as the F20-A. It is more advanced than the space shuttles developed
long after. And, it goes so fast, the eye can not perceive it. That means it is ostensibly
invisible while in flight.
In addition, Russia views the Democratization of Georgia in the same way that most
other countries do, except the citizens of the United States, who don't understand that
our democratization of these other countries simply allows us to install governments
susceptible to the methods clearly outlined in the documents below.
the World Today:
Sit down, relax, maybe have a drink first
Read The full Document - worth reading
First off, we will be able to keep all countries under our
control. They will submit to this control because they well know that we have the power to
create disorders or to restore order whenever we like.
All these countries are quite used to the fact that we possess the indispensable force
of extortion [economic sanctions]. Secondly, by means of conspiracies and scheming we
shall cause utter confusion by the strings we have tied into the cabinets of all nations.
We have created these controls within the governments by means of political and economic
treaties or loan obligations
"The president, at our direction, will make interpretations of existing laws that
are vague enough to be twisted to say what we desire. "
"He will also annul or make of none-effect those laws when we indicate to him the
necessity of doing so. Besides this, he will have the right to propose temporary laws and
even new directions in how the government works with the constitution."
"His justification for all of this he will give as the supreme welfare of the
people and the nation."
"By such measures we shall obtain the power of destroying little by little, step
by step, all of the things we introduced into the constitutions in the first place. This
will prepare for the transition to an unperceived abolition of every kind of constitution.
When the time has come, we will turn every form of government into our
One of the ways the U.S. Government works is to install a Democratic Government in
countries who can then be economically coerced. After all, the CIA is well known for using
propaganda to overthrow Democratically elected governments, as was the attempted case in
Venezuela with Hugo Chavez in their latest Democratic elections (he is not a dictator as
the American media calls him).
Therefore, Russia's invasion of Georgia, (actually the othere way around) while likely
due to numerous considerations, most certainly is a response to the geo-political goals of
the United States and the Council on Foreign Relations, to which Obama and McCain are
pledged. Otherwise, they would not be allowed to be Presidential nominees. And the proof
and history of that arrangement goes back to the 50's, the Rockefellers, Standard Oil,
Exxon, Shell... and on and on.
The truth of how Georgia invaded Russia. See also: Media
While the leaders of the United States dazzle us with their moral high-ground and
catchy cliches, the fact is that they will do nothing, unless it is to drag us into yet
another conflict for oil, or present us with circumstances that there is, in fact a need
for perpetual war and control of the world oil supply. The Bush family has a history of
starting wars right before leaving office.
Finally, while McCain and Obama pander to the American public by preaching restraint
and/or military action in order to provide voters with the facade of a choice of
candidates and positions....
The real issue that must be addressed is: What actions could we, and the world. take to
come to agreement and terms such that nations do not feel justified - out of the
perception and goal of self-defense - to take actions that violate human and civil rights
- militarily or through social oppression - that would otherwise be accommodated by
non-coercive fair trade.
And then, what can we as citizens do to inform our politicians that we will no longer
accept their simplistic explanations, distortions and PR statements to justify our
militaristic government, against the will of the people - that has committed us to over
200 armed conflicts in other nations since the U.S. was created, and has our troops
overtly and covertly operating in more than 100 nations right now, against the
constitutional laws of those nations we are essentially invading.
While this will not be considered a popular appraisal of
the situation, I believe it will be seen as the most honest one presented in a public