About this site

Work to Do

About God

For the
of the World

(The Book)

Table of Contents


Letters to


With America






2008 & Older


About Me
My Journals

upleft.gif (893 bytes)

upright.gif (897 bytes)

For the Love of the World

Being: Politically Correct



lovelogosm.gif (2679 bytes)

Global Peace
Abundance for All!




Universal Church of the Kingdom of God Michael Jackson - Black Or White

I've said for along time that I'd like to delete a few words from the language.

The first I'd delete is hate. The idea is that if you could erase the word, hate would no longer exist. Of course, it doesn't work that way. Then, the problem is that we'd have a problem without a word to describe it, and then it would go unnoticed, and no one would do anything about it.

In the United States, we've all sort of been convinced into thinking that if we tolerate diversity, then we are creating an environment of equal opportunity and freedom, and are color blind. And, we make believe that by making people feel bad for using words like nigger, that racism and bigotry will go away, and that the problem will go away by ignoring it.

The problem is, for people who have experienced racism, the word nigger still hurts. That's an indication that the problem isn't solved, and the healing that has always been needed isn't complete.

When Attorney General Eric Holder said that Americans don't have the courage to discuss racism, I think he's wrong in one way, and right in another. He's wrong, because people are willing to discuss it. The problem is, you have to have the courage not to discuss it, but to be honest about it, knowing that honesty would have you be criticized no matter how correct your point on a topic is.

For example, if I was a black person in this country, I would be just as offended by people saying they are tolerant of me. To me, tolerant means putting up with something I wish I didn't have to deal with, but am forced to. Diversity is a pretty impersonal word. So for me, tolerating diversity is like saying I have to put up with something that resembles more of an object than a person to me. I would never expect someone to say publicly "I put up with niggers", but that's the way I hear it when politicians speak of tolerating diversity. And it annoys me, because, like so many other people,  I've done my share of work toward causing real equality among people in general, and to me, glossing over a problem is no way to resolve one.

But, if we're going to put a label or catch phrase to our approach to human relations, why not acceptance and community? I think it expresses something a little friendlier and inclusive - and caring.

Orig URL: bluediam.gif (123 bytes) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5HKwh4VjJus from bluediam.gif (123 bytes) Lou Dobbs Tonight, CNN July 9, 2009

Susan CANDIOTTI: Twelve-year-old Marcus Allen (ph) is her son, says he was sitting outside the pool and heard white adults say this.

MARCUS ALLEN, VISITOR: They was like oh why are these black kids here. And then they were saying oh I'm afraid they might do something to my children. I don't know if they might steal -- might try to steal some of my stuff or might try to like harm my children. And I was like amazed that they would say something like this because we're just like you -- like we're just like your kids.


CANDIOTTI: Mrs. Wright says the swim club's director told her he was embarrassed, held an emergency board meeting, and called her back the next day to say they could not come back.

WRIGHT: And he said the membership said let the chips fall where they may.

CANDIOTTI (on camera): You know, Marcus, I see tears coming down your face. Why does this make you cry?

MARCUS: Because it's kind of like sad that like people are still thinking like this when I felt like these things was over.

WRIGHT: This is 2009. Children should not be subjected to that.

CANDIOTTI (voice-over): The swim club's director is quoted by local media saying the day camp kids changed the "atmosphere and complexion of the club" -- a club member reacted.

See also: bluediam.gif (123 bytes) The Confederate Flag

If the issue was solved, if we truly are color blind, then the story above could not have happened.

Universal Church of the Kingdom of God Tom Clay - What the World Needs Now

I'm certainly in favor of people being sensitive toward the feelings and sensitivities of other people. I don't say things like I just did for the sake of shocking you. I did it to draw your attention to the fact that we can not have conversations as individuals, or as a society, if we are not able to speak freely and tell the truth, so that we can exchange additional information and ideas that will lead us to greater understanding.

One other thing on this subject: sometimes people think I am being politically incorrect by calling people with dark skin black people. I am actually very sensitive to respecting how people like to be addressed. However, while trying to be politically correct while living in Atlanta years ago, a friend of mine objected to being called African American. I asked him why, and he said it was because he was from Columbia.

I grew up with memories from the 50's and 60's when it was considered granting greater dignity and respect by referring to black people as colored or Negroes, which I was never comfortable with either, despite knowing it was better than the alternatives of the time. And still, I find it necessary to be concerned at who I might be offending by calling people with dark skin "black people". I call myself a white person.

But even more, it's a perfect example of how, even when we try to appropriately elevate the image and dignity and respect for a group based upon any kind of stereotype, it stifles open discussion as people almost always want to do the right thing, but are concerned about speaking up because they don't know the right words despite having no negative intent toward anyone.

Being politically correct would mean I could not tell Latinos that technically, they are illegal aliens, and I have no problem with the idea of creating better ways to provide work and not have undocumented workers threatened with deportation, but by legal means that is fair and equitable, ensures people's rights, and... and even more importantly...

It would have me fail to also report that they should be aware that proponents of the Council on Foreign Relations, failed portions of NAFTA and the unchartered goals of our nation's politicians to cause a North American Union is promoting the easing of "undocumented workers" in the United States in order to fulfill the coming need for cheap labor in the near future. Cheap labor at subsistence wages, also known as slave wages. Further, that such a union would compromise Mexico's sovereignty, and the security of its natural resources, as well as destabilizing its economy further.

Again, the problem is not really about the willingness to discuss matters. It's about the ability to discuss matters respectfully, in a way that allows for truth and doesn't gloss over the stereotypes and negative images of other people that damage the fabric of our society to benefit politicians and business people.

It's not just about racism. It's about religion, likes and dislikes, sexuality.. you name it. And every time you pigeon hole something into a stereotype, you forget that, for example, a man who wears long hair isn't necessarily a drug addict, a man in dirty clothes on the street hitchhiking may not be a slob, but a man with a car problem, that single men over 40  are automatically suspected child molesters...

Think about all the types of people you now think of in your mind as dangerous or people to be careful of for one reason or another. Think about it for a few days. Start noticing how when you approach a man or a woman, how do you prepare yourself mentally to deal with that person. Notice the sexuality in play, your considering the differences between sexes, how clothing affects the way you assess and treat people. You'll begin to notice those built-in reactions we have been trained to have toward each other.

And then, imagine the conversations you'd need to have if you were to discuss the things that come between you and other people because of those observations, and do so by being politically correct. It could be done, but it would be difficult. Think about that until it becomes obvious to you, because it will.

Then, think of what it would be like to have those conversations on TV, in a public forum as a means to have a truly meaningful discussion.

Sometimes I believe it's good to be politically  incorrect to show people how it can get in the way.

Or, how using a word or a phrase or an example of something, even as an abhorration, will generate publicity from something taken out of context just because it contains a sensitive word.

That's how divisive politics works, and one way the media is used to suppress social issues until and unless the political agenda of the government can make use of  it.

In specific regard to racism, I am quite pleased to know that much progress has been made since I was  a child in the 50's. But I also know the work isn't done, but it can't be completed by using sensationalism to generate more division that will delay true equality.

Like I said, there's nothing wrong with being politically correct, I do it all the time. But, I also know, people don't say things frequently because they're afraid of "getting in trouble" for accidentally saying something that the media has decided to punish people for saying, and encourages other people to do the same toward any others who dare say a word that's been "banned" through re-education propaganda in the media.

One day I'll tell you a story defending Bill O'Reilly for something he said. I didn't like the way he said it, but his point was clear and very true a great deal of time. But the only thing that got attention was the way he said it... and when he said what he said, he actually opened the door for someone, anyone, to eloquently walk in and say "I don't like the way you said that, but your point is well taken, and I appreciate the opportunity it provides for people to know you're affected by stereotypes that give you false impressions of things, and that you've realized how false those impressions are, and that your audience now knows that maybe they have false impressions too".

Instead, O' Reilly was accused of being racist. Trust me, I'm not really defending Bill O'Reilly, I'm defending the point he was trying to make. A courageous discussion possibly, lost to the sensationalism for political correctness, which stifles intellectually honest conversation, and discourages mutual understanding and equality.

I have no doubt that this writing will be considered politically incorrect, maybe even condemned for it. Or, maybe, people will understand what I'm saying, and start a conversation called, the dangers of political correctness in the face  of expressing respect and granting others their right to human dignity. Something like that.

We might discover a way to agree to really talk to each other.

That truly would be politically incorrect these days.



  Universal Church of God - Bluebeam  Audio File To Listen To  Kingdom of God Communications     Movies  NEWS!!!  God Bless America! God Bless Its  Citizens  A Note From The Desk Of Chuck Rehn  For the Love of the WorldFor the Love of the WorldUniversal Church of the Kingdom of God   Universal Church of the Kingdom of God bluediam.gif (123 bytes)



upleft.gif (893 bytes)   upright.gif (897 bytes)

1965-2009 Charles Rehn Jr IV and Kingdom of God Communications, Inc. ™  All Rights Reserved   Fair Use Policy 

kite_lg_clr.gif (8058 bytes)


rainb00a.gif (232 bytes)
It's a
Whole, New World!
All you have to do is want it!

With God,
Everything is Possible!

Creating the Future By Empowering People


humbirat.gif (15553 bytes)

Have you been to the Brain Dump?

brain.gif (8636 bytes)

Unclassified information of all kinds!